Aquasana AQ-5200 vs Home Master TMA — Which Should You Buy?

Side-by-side comparison of Aquasana AQ-5200 and Home Master TMA. We compare specs, performance, and value to help you decide.

Updated 2026-03-09 Independently reviewed
Aquasana AQ-5200

Aquasana AQ-5200

9/10
$106 /one-time
VS
Home Master TMA

Home Master TMA

8.7/10
$349 /one-time

Feature Comparison

Feature Aquasana AQ-5200 Home Master TMA
Type Carbon block RO with pump
Certification NSF —
Removes Lead, PFOA, PFOS, microplastics 99% including fluoride
Capacity 500 gallons 75 GPD
Filter Life 6 months —
Electricity None —
Installation Under sink —
Warranty 1 year 1 year
Waste Ratio — 1:1 or better
Pump — Permeate pump
Stages — 3
Tank — 3.2 gallon

Aquasana AQ-5200

Pros

  • ✓NSF certified
  • ✓Removes lead, PFOA, PFOS
  • ✓No electricity
  • ✓No tank
  • ✓Easy installation
  • ✓Affordable
  • ✓Good flow rate

Cons

  • ✗Not RO
  • ✗Filter replacements ~$60
  • ✗Doesn't remove fluoride

Home Master TMA

Pros

  • ✓Permeate pump
  • ✓1:1 waste ratio
  • ✓99% removal
  • ✓Removes fluoride
  • ✓3-stage simplicity
  • ✓Artesian full contact
  • ✓Less water waste

Cons

  • ✗Requires power
  • ✗Higher price
  • ✗More complex

Our Verdict

Aquasana AQ-5200

The best value under-sink filter—NSF-certified contaminant removal without the cost of RO.

Special Deal Available — See Offer

Home Master TMA

The best under-sink RO for eco-conscious buyers—minimal water waste with permeate pump.

Limited Offer — Check Today's Price

Our Methodology

We test each under-sink filter for contaminant reduction, installation ease, and long-term cost. No manufacturer has editorial influence.

Related Comparisons